نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية
المؤلف
قسم الفقه المقارن , كلية البنات الأزهرية في مدينة طيبة الجديدة , جامعة الأزهر – الأقصر – جمهورية مصر العربية
المستخلص
الكلمات الرئيسية
عنوان المقالة [English]
المؤلف [English]
The research dealt with blood money in premeditated and semi-intentional killing. If a person commits what God has forbidden and kills intentionally, then the penalty is of the same kind as the work, so he will be punished for it, unless the guardian of the murdered person is exempted, or the killing was unintentional or semi-intentional. The money owed as a result of a felony against a freedman in or less than a soul, with an indication of the types in which blood money is due, and mentioning the amount that is due in each type and clarifying. Blood money is for premeditated murder, and it is obligatory in all types of murder, but it is not determined in premeditated murder unless the guardian of the blood pardons the punishment, or if one of the conditions for its obligation is lost. They are: the infallibility of the blood of the murdered, assignment and reward, not giving birth, and being offense intentionally. Is the consent of the perpetrator required in premeditated murder over the blood money? In fact, there is no disagreement among the jurists about the legitimacy of the blood money as a punishment for intentional killing in the event that qisas is dropped for one of the reasons that lead to its fall, and the guardians of blood did not pardon it. For blood money, and the amount of blood money, the jurists differed in the amount of blood money for intentional killing, it seems that the correct one is the saying that the blood money for intentional killing is triangular with the evidence of his saying, may God’s prayers and peace be upon
الكلمات الرئيسية [English]
)
مشاهدة على SCiNiTO